The Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: How Prosperity and Deprivation Are Found Side by Side in Across England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants live in properties just a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall physically separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” remarked a resident, 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common National Picture
Analysis of official statistics shows the extent of inequality often exists, at times across little more than a short distance of asphalt, a line of hedges or a wall. Years of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a locality classified as one of the poorest in the country.
The geographical widening of deprivation has led to a significant increase in the quantity of locations where disadvantaged and well-off residents find themselves living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the wealthiest. This number increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Barrier Which Divides More Than Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the biggest in the UK and starkly apparent. The wall transcends being just a symbolic divide; it causes tangible difficulties for everyday life.
- The school commute that should take 15-20 minutes turn into an hour-long journey.
- Reaching important services like grocery stores, educational facilities and care homes is hindered.
- The area often sees antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being thrown over the wall and other issues.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one resident, motioning at the rusted barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship
Within Centre4, staff stress that need transcends postcodes. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” explained director Tracey Good.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a strong sense and sense of community among its residents. By contrast, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope estate in Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is closely bordered by spacious houses built in the 2000s that are in the top 10% for job prospects and living environment.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” commented Phil Hockley, aged 63. “It’s likely a lot of people over there don’t even speak to each other.”
The financial divide is clear: an typical three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Residents speak of a palpable sense of being overlooked. “This part of the community gets ignored,” said holistic health worker Susan. “In this area our facilities have slowly been taken away, and the majority of the community problems here are to do with poverty.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a picture of an ever more divided society, where wealth and deprivation are frequently awkwardly close neighbours.